Does formula have somebody and nurse her/its/their children, and the FORMULA lived, baby obviously grew up more clever?

I nursed my first child for one year and a half, but was told with my second child, that her/its/their colic was because of the proteins in my breastmilk, and I had to give her/its/their formula. It Störte me so very much, that it caused heavy worry, where sleeps couldn\'t I more than 2 hours per night, that should be forced her/its/their formula into softness to cut out instead of the contravening protein only in my food, oh, if only I knew, what I now know.

Am I now curious, do you become, does a baby, who really has formula over nursing, have or make somebody on smarter/more less of an IQ for end, that itself b/feed and formula and the formula provider nourish, intelligent?

through enki90

Best answer chosen by Asker

I believe that intelligence, that is connected with breastmilk, one of La Leche-Verband fanatics, in order to bring each woman to nurse, canceled tactic is whether she/it wants to do it, or not.

I know many very intelligent children, whom formula will nourish, and some quite average one(s), that was nursed, and turned back. Intelligence, my opinion by m,üssen more with genetics does, as working as a nurse.

My older daughter was worked 9 months long as a nurse during with formula supplements. She/it is extremely brightly, student always was before the curve and now is very good in the first year at an important university and doing. Her/its/their jüngere sister was worked as a nurse for almost one year exclusively and was disaccustomed with 18 months. She/it also is very light, but her/its/their sister probably is before her on much manner. Her/its/their sister tends, wettbewerbsfähiger to be, that I think, has become work more longer than nurses to do with genetics and surroundings, one, sooner than which or with all.

For members of my generation, care was discouraged in general and still, I know some quite light people, who never were nursed. , Thereß really brings me to the thinking is a LLL-Mythos of the newer Mütter-Kauf in and is done to feel like failures, if they can, \'t or doesn\'t want to work as a nurse.

Relax so, you get any sleep and doesn\'t provide approximately whether or IQ of your baby not will be higher or will sink as this next baby. Intelligence be really only one number and it, how you use it, is the more important than the number even.

Asker \'s Rating:

Asker \'s Comment:

thank you.

Save to! ! RSS

Other Answers (12)

through desmeran, It is about averages, not individuals. On * on average *, nursed, babies have different, very small, but statistically meaningfully, advantages againstover bottle-feed babies. But only in the average. It becomes much glänzend gives, healthy bottle-fed babies... and much slowly, sickly nursed babies. Tons of other factors ouchßer breast/bottle come also in game. It wäre at all, for somebody surprises in order not to have a more clever formula fed baby, as bottle nourished baby. If however, you look at thousand of children, there is any small statistical benefit from those, that were nursed.

Source(s,:

had to fill feed for medical reasons. all my children work well before degree level. Breast milk schlägt bottles statistically, but fills, you beat starvation at all without any question, and dort\'s absolutely no point of it, to thrash itself/themselves over it, since particularly the difference in IQ, even over very big populations, is very small.

through muffin I wouldnt knows that, but the problem had i, that my daughter had yellow jaundice, so that i formula tried, and it removed it, now if says i, she/it is very advanced for her/its/their old, believes i, that she/it is.

You/they say, that breast milk always is the best, but formula essentially has all matters, children also need, and i dont sees, as they, as they were, were fed, babies actually tell the inteligence-Niveau. Is to be done on it got more, how productively you are with your children, if she/it then moves you dont them at lived, you learn, but this more makes you the better, they get matters, and they go progressed.

Thats my opinion.

through James H, there was a joke once, that was,: -
` Oh, your son looks like a monkey! ` natthe mother was not glad ürlich. Who I or the father?
` Oh, your son nurses. He/it is clever and looks very much like you/his-Vati. `
Then, the young woman, who sat beside her/its/their friend, was not glad. I fütterte my son of cow`s milk. will he/it be dumb like a cow and look like a cow?!
I really have a ground don`t!

Source(s,:

333 Ooops, carefully this, which you say!!!

I also am correct partially promoted through JAGS very small and nascent the IQ-Sache being from LL to. That, from what I believe matters, is more the binding experience. Women, who nurse, * has you * her/its/their babies, to hold, about her/it/them narrowly too füttern and often. A good deal of the Bevölkerungsstütze on one bottle beside a baby and leaves her/it/them self feed. I believe, thereß, if you press your baby, during bottle feeding and interacts with them, there is not any significant difference in her/its/their IQ.

I have 3 children, 1 exclusively breast and 2 this was a combo. All are so clever, it startles me.

through az_mommm... I never nursed, but if it helps, my most recent is 10 and was told us in the age of 5 that his/its IQ rose by 125. So seemingly the formula didn\'t causes his/its IQ, he/it still is very intelligent.

So, I would become not to worry!

about cathrl69-Tausende of people, you have.

It is a small statistical effect. In the average nursed, babies are some klüger. This doesn\'t-Mitte, if you take a nursed baby, and a formula ernährte baby that probably is the nursed one to be more clever, but it means that, if you take ten thousand of those, everyone the average intelligence of the nursed babies will be higher.

Source(s,:

Basic statistics. Don\'t, that they teach, thereß in schools none more?

through dein_85, I know, that I will get thumbs downs and everything, but I will nevertheless answer.
My brother and I were fed both formula. My mother had toxemia with both of us and this Doctors, didn\'t say her/it/them to breast feed. We has both a high IQ. Both of us are at the genius brand (140).
Nursed, children tend to be healthier, but I still must find solid proof one piece that they are more clever. Es\'s actually quite hurtful if people assume, these nursed children are klügeres considerations, I know that I was fed formula.
But I also know, that I have a very high IQ, I was assumed into many ivy association schools, and my brother was so and I got high degrees and test, the whole time achieves if I was in the school.
Her/its/their daughter could not have some of the healthy advantages to be nursed, but it doesn\'t mean that she/it will be less intelligent. Form elfno postponement causes ütterung. There, children, who are intelligent, become much formula ernährt. And many nursed children of the aren\'t. muß And IQ not very much with it does, how intelligently a person is, intelligence quotient is an attempt to be measured through several, standardized examinations, about intelligence. It is no definitive one from it whether not or a child is clever. Charles Manson has a high IQ. This should inform you of something.

lvn from Karen, that the IQ-Unterschied is less than a point. it doesn\'t make any difference für the average person.Do, you don\'t worry therefore. I studied this thouroughly.
I was W.I.C. - nurse.

through storyint... oh gives you to me a break, yes studies opinion manages silence more clever children, my son was nursed NOT true, and formula lived, my daughter was fed formula. both of my children have iq very high, is everywhere about genetics.

my husbands iq is approximately 174. mine is 145

I know many mommies, who worked as a nurse, and her/its/their children are NO where hurts as mine

through ladydye_... i doubts it highly. my twins nursed 3 weeks long i until i ran out. they then were on formula,,,,they, is completely fine. both is, Ehrenrollen-students,,,one is HIGH honor, is very intelligent, and one is VERY mechanical and scientific. there are studies, that prove this or this. i was strictly gefütterte bottle and was, you also honor role and a talented program. persit thinks i önlich that it is you your child more of those, how you lift, teaches, as which milk is in his/her-Flasche.
my children are very healthy, other than usual childhood illnesses, very intelligent, big, gets thinner, active children. there is any woman, who cannot nurse, and her/its/their children are, only fine,,and there is some women, who nurse, and the children have problems. You/they müssen this, which is the best for you and your baby and doesn\'t have any regret over it, does.

Is property through Canadian beavers it brought together members of LaLeche Leaque of nourished conspiracy only one and this who is paid by them, there is absolutely nothing more further than the truth.

Is genetically Mu-Tochter (breast-feed) and my son (not BF), as said others, not only hurt you because of him/it, which they ate or drank.

Seem, ridiculous people still actually believe it, only bc it is media hype, and people follow that, what is told to them. And es\'s based on the research, in which LaLeche paid, and they took the research facts, thereß she/it into the "best light "like with most matters in lives you color even placed the best, if you make for him/it.

It seems only somewhat similar, other guiltily a parents feeling, to do, as if we don\'t carry any enuf-Schuld on our shoulders.

from KP Während my answer your question not directly answers, I hope that it brings you to feeling better. I was, a formula ernährte baby and, not to toot my own horn, I have an above mentioned average IQ. IchIch was f in the talented and talented program in the school and graduated collegeür computer science. Sometimes, I think, thereß IQ completely independent from it is, you nurture. I weiß, that middle finishes speaking, but I know didn\'t for myself my intelligence of my parents inherits, and obviously also not from breast milk whom they are meant in order to be regardless of this, which we do for her/it/them, will sometimes be exactly children.