Is breast the really best?

I and everyone heard nursing unequivocally, is the best for the baby. Is it really however? Take a mother with one extremely bad food. Wir\'ll uses a friend of me für an example, she/it lives more than mountain dew, pizza and cigarettes of nothing. Können you me honestly says that switched on the consuming of this type of junk with empty calories and no nutritional value really the best to your baby to passport is? As your baby could möglicherweise the vitamins and the nutrients, that he/it or she/it need, gets if you eat like it?

Maybe breast is the best in most cases, but definitely not everything.

through food C

Best answer chosen by voters

No, it is not. It is normal, and it still is to thinks artificially, milks, if the food of mommy Ersatz-pari is. Baby still becomes which s/he-Bedürfnisse gets, it is mommy, who will suffer from a junk chimney food.

This connection explains the relationship of the food of mommy and the milk of mommy: Save to! ! RSS

Other Answers (4)

from Vicky.? I agrees, that this breast is the normally best, because it allows the baby to profit from the antibodies, did the mother produce already, and protects against infections, against which the baby could be susceptible otherwise. But, with a mother with one either probably should extremely bad food or cut from the breast milk limits, she/it feeds her/its/their child and her/its/their counters to either a better food, or one of the formulas, that is available. 20 percent 1 voices

by precisely m in this case, the cigarettes could be passed so many poisons this in them to baby... I would have to say "no". the human K now as far as an unhealthy food isörper amazingly and capable, to produce healthy breast milk, even if the Mutter\'s-Nahrung is not all of this healthy.In the long run, that the mother would be the one, in order to suffer from her/its/their bad food. With all of it, it said, the healthier the meal, that she/it ißt,... the healthier she/it both will be:)

through Bilo Handerson noo 20 percent 1 voices

from Lunachic.... Breastmilk is the normal way to nourish a baby. Für starters, formula doesn, \'t has all astonishing immune-promoting \'active\' components, that breastmilk has.

Even an inferior food cannot stop any breastmilk, because she/it be he/it super food it, the priority of the body places vitamins and minerals in breastmilk. A study before a few years (Intl journal of BFing), 2008, if I remember correctly, showed, thereß in anemic mothers, insufficient iron, had babies normal iron levels even after 6 months of nursing.

If a mommy smokes, it is better that she/it nurses, as formula feed, although she/it should try smoked having not to immediately nourish any baby because of babies, who get second hand smoke, and, to minimize nicotine levels in milk, is the half-life of the nicotine ninety-five minutes.
While the smoking of parents reduces the respiratory health of the babies, eg. großartigeres occurrence of pneumonia, bronchitis and SIDS during the first year, the risk is even more wonderful if babies with formula milk are nourished.
Effects on milk are relatively small if they smoke less as 20 cigarettes per day.

I think the body mines a mother\'s fat stores for what it must make breastmilk.

Source(s,:

/101 /